How offensive is it really? No matter how they worked it out if you could make your enemy so sexually arroused that they took it out on each other or the locals it would have achieved the objective of breaking down unit coheasiveness without it being leathal. Seems to be a laudable goal to me.
Make Love, Not War!
I'm only offended cause it's politically correct to be so. Oh, oh, oh, such a horrible terrible thing. Oh, I'm ssssthooooo hurt. My feelings are so hurt. Oh deary me. Attack Queens atttack!!! Hit them with your high heels and lacy bras!!! Attack the pentago with your stilletos.
How is this offensive? It's basically a non-lethal chemical weapon. It wouldn't turn them permanently gay, it would disorient and distract them for a long enough time for us to either kill them or force a surrender. It would only be lethal if the enemy soldiers started getting jealous and started killing each other which isn't that bad either.
A huge element that a lot of people are missing here is the fact that Islam (sorry abotu being so general about who our enemy is) STRICTLY outlaws homosexual behaviour. Failling to work with these conditions will get you killed in certain parts of the Middle East where these religious radicals reside. An aphrodesiac liek this would turn the enemy against their very morals and teachings. Thusly teh loose their morale drastically. It does sound like an awesome prank idea though... Haha
LMFAO!! Hey Pentagon, tell ya what--why don't you let some of us invite the enemy to a "Blue Party" and have them defect once they realize how gay men can throw great parties.
Maybe they stopped research because they know that weapons have a way of turning up in enemy hands and they wouldnt want to used on them? This story is very old btw.
its not even bad or offensive or anything. its just a biochemical weapon where, instead of spilling blood, just makes the soldiers have a sudden uncontrollable sexual urge, which is probably really distracting on the battlefield. i think its a novel idea. its not like it turns them gay, it just temporarily incapacitates them.
How truly f*cking bizarre!
And to know that people are paid to create such nonsense makes me ashamed to be an American. No wonder the world makes fun of us.
The key to this weapon would be tuning it to affect only approx 30% to 50% of the troops. Then the in-fighting between troops would disable the force's effectiveness. No matter what ideology/nationality, combat troops hate fags.
Would be friggin hilarious to go out into battle and run into 1000 Iraqi soldiers screwing each other. How do you handle this? Shoot or interuppt them?
Is the gay rights guy at the end dumb or what? He should really understand the idea before he complains that it suggests that gays are incompetent. The point of the bomb is to make them want to fuck the shit out of each other, not make them wear pink.
gaybomb=funny war
I thought he was going to start sucking on the microphone.
That "gay bomb" idea would probably work well. It would start to break down their system. Why do you think the U.S. army fefuses to recruit openly gay people? Not because anybody "hates" them, but because it would start to break down the system. It's a big distraction.
Comments (32)
To post a comment, you need to login or signup.