glumbert - Ball Girl Video Is Fake!

In the 80s the TV set makers wanted to find out if there was a market for higher definition TV, so they asked people what should be improved about TV. The general request was for an intelligent program...

corrupthardware

4 months ago

Thank god there's a video here to tell us about the other video here.

vergoox

4 months ago

Is this a commercial?

mako100

4 months ago

Did anyone call this orginally?

mako100

4 months ago

The answer is yeh.

Thought the fall back took a little long but am not a rounders fan so was unaware...

webx3u

4 months ago

Funny how the black woman thinks a 6 foot vertical is perfectly viable.

prezuiwf

4 months ago

This was a great explanation.

"Explanation: It's fake!"
"It's fake?"
"It's not real!"
"Oh, hahahaha! It's fake!"

/explanation

webx3u

4 months ago

Didn't you hear "there were cables and things like that!"

mimic

4 months ago

The world is full of fakes take me for ins'''''''''''''''''''''

canadaman

4 months ago

when usa landed on the moon in the sixties, fake or real?

infinity

4 months ago

from 1:26 to the rest of the movie, fuck it. drivel.

badlywipedbuttocks

4 months ago

That makes it a great video in my book.

chaz

4 months ago

OK...I guess I'll have to accept that it's a fake, but someone is in for exceptional credit here anyway (maybe):

- the pitcher had to throw the ball very accurately
- the batter had to hit the ball in an incredibly precise manner
- the ball had to reach a given spot at a given instant
- the ballgirl had to get to that precise spot at an exact moment
- the catch itself is astonishing, especially if dangling from cables

I dunno...how many "takes" must have been necessary to get all those elements to come together at the same instant, eh?

I might have a problem believing an unassisted five or six foot leap, but can someone enlighten me on these how other issues can be explained away?

...or can they all be "edited" into the flic manually, somehow?

Y' know, any time I get in this position (where it seems like I may be the only one not "getting it"), I fear the answer is so simple, and I am simply looking past it, which makes me appear like such a dolt...so if the answer is that blatantly obvious, please be kind when pointing it out, so that my frail ego is not overly bruised.

thebug

4 months ago

Follow the link serious provided, it explains how the vid was made.

chaz

4 months ago

Okeydokey Bug....guess it's smoke and mirrors (actually neither, but might's well be).

She's pretty agile, tho', doncha think...she can catch my ball anytime, no strings attached...or cables either.

badlywipedbuttocks

4 months ago

Infinity is a certifiable cretin.

chaz

4 months ago

Actually, even cretins have their standards...doubtful that Infinity has dropped to a depth they might certify.

On the other hand, you have, yourself, set previously unimaginable levels for tiresome vacuousness which may garner for you recognition far below the Infint's capacity for tediousness.

I would congratulate you for your unique position at the nadir of the loser curve if only that to do so risks contamination via proximity...not a fate one would willingly embrace.

In short, get a life other than your unremitting put-down of another poster - who, by the way, I do not defend.

vergoox

4 months ago

Infinity is nothing compared to Chaos.
Uh huh Uhhhmerican.

badlywipedbuttocks

4 months ago

I accept your criticism Chaz.
And I am also pleased to note you do not defend the retard Infinity, despite the fact he believes he is the most popular man on Glumbert.
I am afraid I will not relent from attacking the little shit - not beause he is stupid, but because, frankly, he is a pretentious, deluded fool.

To post a comment, you need to login or signup.